Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make "ratio" the primary label for PATO:0001470 ! proportionality to #555

Closed
cmungall opened this issue Feb 26, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #556
Closed

Make "ratio" the primary label for PATO:0001470 ! proportionality to #555

cmungall opened this issue Feb 26, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #556

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor

id: PATO:0001470
name: proportionality to
def: "A quality inhering in a bearer by virtue of the bearer's magnitude in respect to a related entity." [PATOC:nw]
synonym: "proportion" EXACT []
synonym: "proportionality" EXACT []
synonym: "quotient" EXACT []
synonym: "ratio" EXACT [] !! **make this the primary label**
synonym: "rate" RELATED []
is_a: PATO:0001018 ! physical quality
@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also: make the definition more like a conventional definition of ratio

@rays22 rays22 self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
@rays22 rays22 moved this to In Progress in @rays22's triage and progress Feb 28, 2024
rays22 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
of
* PATO:0001470 ratio
and child terms
* PATO:0040043 increased ratio
* PATO:0040042 decreased ratio

Also, improve the logical definitions of 'increased ratio' and 'decreased' by using EQs.

Resolve #555
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in @rays22's triage and progress Mar 14, 2024
@rays22 rays22 moved this from Done to Blocked in @rays22's triage and progress Jul 3, 2024
@rays22 rays22 moved this from Blocked to Done in @rays22's triage and progress Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants