You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be something not quite correct with the field tage_star in the output catalogues.
The data is in the range 10^8 - 10^9 but the units are reported as being internal time units, which would typically be something like 9*10^9 years already.
I don't know whether the issue is in the calculation of the values or whether the units displayed are incorrect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Let me know if you need a dataset of any kind. This is what the ages look like now:
where I discarded the units and replaced then with years. Note that this run is not super-well calibrated so it may look all rubbish because the simulation itself was. :)
There seems to be something not quite correct with the field
tage_star
in the output catalogues.The data is in the range
10^8
-10^9
but the units are reported as being internal time units, which would typically be something like 9*10^9 years already.I don't know whether the issue is in the calculation of the values or whether the units displayed are incorrect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: