From c3da29ea559f6421907f8793adeb8eff718f7e0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: TomShawn <41534398+TomShawn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:30:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix image display error (#6169) --- .../v5.1-performance-benchmarking-with-tpch.md | 3 ++- ...spark.png => tidb-v5.1-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png} | Bin 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) rename media/{tidb-v5-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png => tidb-v5.1-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png} (100%) diff --git a/benchmark/v5.1-performance-benchmarking-with-tpch.md b/benchmark/v5.1-performance-benchmarking-with-tpch.md index 39e6ccd6be727..5789af56240af 100644 --- a/benchmark/v5.1-performance-benchmarking-with-tpch.md +++ b/benchmark/v5.1-performance-benchmarking-with-tpch.md @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ --- title: TiDB TPC-H 100GB Performance Test Report -- v5.1 MPP mode vs. Greenplum 6.15.0 and Apache Spark 3.1.1 summary: Compare the TPC-H 100GB performance of TiDB 5.1 MPP mode, Greenplum 6.15.0, and Apache Spark 3.1.1. +aliases: ['/tidb/dev/v5.1-performance-benchmarking-with-tpch'] --- # TiDB TPC-H 100GB Performance Test Report -- TiDB v5.1 MPP mode vs. Greenplum 6.15.0 and Apache Spark 3.1.1 @@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ The test of Apache Spark uses Apache Parquet as the storage format and stores th | 21 | 24.44 | 39.08594 | 34.83 | | 22 | 1.23 | 7.67476 | 4.59 | -![TPC-H](/media/tidb-v5-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png) +![TPC-H](/media/tidb-v5.1-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png) In the performance diagram above: diff --git a/media/tidb-v5-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png b/media/tidb-v5.1-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png similarity index 100% rename from media/tidb-v5-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png rename to media/tidb-v5.1-tpch-100-vs-gp-spark.png