-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sorter(ticdc): use correct cgroup memory limit in some scenarios (#8589) #8623
sorter(ticdc): use correct cgroup memory limit in some scenarios (#8589) #8623
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has not been approved. To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
23f4447
to
435e811
Compare
/run-all-tests |
/hold |
f68cb32
to
d011bf5
Compare
/run-all-tests |
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
// | ||
// ============================================================ | ||
// Forked from https://github.com/KimMachineGun/automemlimit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
github.com/KimMachineGun/automemlimit
requires go >= 1.19, so fork the cgroup part to fit go 1.18 in release-6.1
/run-all-tests |
2 similar comments
/run-all-tests |
/run-all-tests |
dbe0d38
to
32a0601
Compare
/run-all-tests |
/run-all-tests |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-6.1 #8623 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 58.8157%
================================================
Files ? 817
Lines ? 108187
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 63631
Misses ? 38855
Partials ? 5701 |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: d963c5e
|
/run-verify |
/unhold |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #8589
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #8588
What is changed and how it works?
Use a better way to fetch cgroup memory limit.
Check List
Tests
Have been verified in the following scenarios
docker run
container undercontainerd-shim-runc-v2
with memory limitdocker run
container undercontainerd-shim-runc-v2
without memory limitQuestions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note