diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
index fe3df23a259578..c6569f98d25144 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
@@ -1593,8 +1593,8 @@ j1939_session *j1939_xtp_rx_rts_session_new(struct j1939_priv *priv,
 	struct j1939_sk_buff_cb skcb = *j1939_skb_to_cb(skb);
 	struct j1939_session *session;
 	const u8 *dat;
+	int len, ret;
 	pgn_t pgn;
-	int len;
 
 	netdev_dbg(priv->ndev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
@@ -1653,7 +1653,22 @@ j1939_session *j1939_xtp_rx_rts_session_new(struct j1939_priv *priv,
 	session->tskey = priv->rx_tskey++;
 	j1939_sk_errqueue(session, J1939_ERRQUEUE_RX_RTS);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(j1939_session_activate(session));
+	ret = j1939_session_activate(session);
+	if (ret) {
+		/* Entering this scope indicates an issue with the J1939 bus.
+		 * Possible scenarios include:
+		 * - A time lapse occurred, and a new session was initiated
+		 *   due to another packet being sent correctly. This could
+		 *   have been caused by too long interrupt, debugger, or being
+		 *   out-scheduled by another task.
+		 * - The bus is receiving numerous erroneous packets, either
+		 *   from a malfunctioning device or during a test scenario.
+		 */
+		netdev_alert(priv->ndev, "%s: 0x%p: concurrent session with same addr (%02x %02x) is already active.\n",
+			     __func__, session, skcb.addr.sa, skcb.addr.da);
+		j1939_session_put(session);
+		return NULL;
+	}
 
 	return session;
 }