-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 590
[xnn update prep] deprecate sdpa #11506
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11506
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit 425ca7e with merge base 5ef38d3 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
@@ -2097,7 +2061,6 @@ DefineNodeFunc getDefineNodeFunc(fb_xnnpack::XNodeUnion nodeType) { | |||
_DEFINE(Concatenate4) | |||
_DEFINE(Concatenate5) | |||
_DEFINE(StaticSlice) | |||
_DEFINE(ScaledDotProductAttention) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not updating schema for marking deprecated? XNNScaledDotProductAttention
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so XNNPACK removed the operator from their codebase, so for next update we need to delete. I can mark the operator in the schema as deprecated though.
@@ -1,111 +0,0 @@ | |||
# Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we continue partitioning this and lower it as decomposed?
Else this will be a BC breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So ever since my new partitioner, SDPA has not been delegated. I assumed that no models in production or since h ave really used any sdpa implementation (also because i heard our sdpa is slow). so I believe this is safe to remove. I can import it internally to make sure
No description provided.