Better function parsing #182
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The original intent of this code (as much as I can remember) was to make it easier to generate multiline examples by wrapping them in an anonymous zero-argument function (the simplest structure that preserves srcrefs). But I'm not sure the code ever worked properly so I reimplemented it from first principles a considerably cleaner approach. This is a robust alternative to the testing helper `evaluate_()`, allowing me to eliminate that helper.
cderv
approved these changes
Jun 27, 2024
Oh I see. I haven't noticed this - I was wondering initially why |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original intent of this code (as much as I can remember) was to make it easier to generate multiline examples by wrapping them in an anonymous zero-argument function (the simplest structure that preserves srcrefs). But I'm not sure the code ever worked properly so I reimplemented it from first principles a considerably cleaner approach.
This is a robust alternative to the testing helper
evaluate_(), allowing me to eliminate that helper.