switch licence from AGPL to MIT #59
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Permission granted! |
|
Sure, go ahead! |
|
Since @mfigurski80's commits were only for benchmark tests which were removed quite a while ago I think I'm ok to proceed without their permission so I'm merging this ready for the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I would like to relicence this
noditlibrary in the next release to use the MIT license rather than the current AGPL licence so it better fits into the rust library ecosystem and can be used by more people.I think I will need permission from all the contributors to do this. @gzsombor, @matt-duch, @mfigurski80, could you give your permission for this re-licensing? I would be much obliged, thanks, ripytide.