Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"All time" should include 1 year into the future #4743

Closed
3 tasks
cielf opened this issue Oct 27, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4750
Closed
3 tasks

"All time" should include 1 year into the future #4743

cielf opened this issue Oct 27, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4750
Assignees
Labels
Good First Issue Suitable for users that are newer or less experienced

Comments

@cielf
Copy link
Collaborator

cielf commented Oct 27, 2024

Summary

Change the "All time" date range to include 1 year into the future

Why?

Some of the dates that are used in the system include future dates (e.g. pick up and delivery dates). They should be included in "All time".

Details

There is a common element used for the date ranges. One way to see it is: sign in as org_admin1@example.com, and click on "Distributions".
This element has an "All Time" choice that currently goes back 100 years from today. It should also go into the future 1 year.

Criteria for completion

  • behaviour as above
  • automated tests to support
  • modification of any current tests regarding future dates and "all time"
@cielf cielf added Help Wanted Groomed + open to all! Good First Issue Suitable for users that are newer or less experienced and removed Help Wanted Groomed + open to all! labels Oct 27, 2024
@jorgecoutinhobr
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to work on this issue

@cielf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cielf commented Oct 27, 2024

Please do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Good First Issue Suitable for users that are newer or less experienced
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants