Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add notes on migrating crates to work with both editions #117

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 10, 2018
157 changes: 157 additions & 0 deletions src/rust-2018/macros/macro-changes.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@

![Minimum Rust version: beta](https://img.shields.io/badge/Minimum%20Rust%20Version-beta-orange.svg)

## `macro_rules!` style macros

In Rust 2018, you can import specific macros from external crates via `use`
statements, rather than the old `#[macro_use]` attribute.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -78,3 +80,158 @@ struct Bar;

This only works for macros defined in external crates.
For macros defined locally, `#[macro_use] mod foo;` is still required, as it was in Rust 2015.

### Local helper macros

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may be useful for authors of crates using foreign helper macros to also have some examples. Those examples may almost look exactly the local examples below so it may be even better to rename this sections helper macros with examples using a mix of both foreign-crate:: and $crate:: alike.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible to merge this PR first, and then address this in a new PR?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most definitely. I'm just a passer by that was pointed at this PR for documentation on the new feature. No blockers here


Sometimes it is helpful or necessary to have helper macros inside your module. This can make
supporting both versions of rust more complicated.

For example, let's make a simplified (and slightly contrived) version of the `log` crate in 2015
edition style:

```rust,ignore
pub struct LogLevel {
Warn,
Error
}

#[doc(hidden)]
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! log {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would rename this macro to private_log! or log_impl! or __log! to make it clear that importing it is not a reasonable fix (because the real log crate does export a public log! macro).

($level:expr, $msg:expr) => {
println!("{}: {}", $level, $msg)
}
}

#[macro_export]
macro_rules! warn {
($msg:expr) => {
log!(stringify!($crate::LogLevel::Warn), $msg)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please pick a different standard library macro to build this demo code around. You would never see stringify! called like this on a crate local path. format_args! could work better.

}
}

#[macro_export]
macro_rules! error {
($msg:expr) => {
log!(stringify!($crate::LogLevel::Error), $msg)
}
}
```

Our `log!` macro is private to our module, but needs to be exported as it is called by other
macros, and in 2015 edition all used macros must be exported.

Now, in 2018 this example will not compile:

```rust,ignore
use log::error;

fn main() {
error!("error message");
}
```

will give an error message about not finding the `log!` macro. This is because unlike in the 2015
edition, macros are namespaced and we must import them. We could do

```rust,ignore
use log::{log, error};
```

which would make our code compile, but `log` is meant to be an implementation detail!

#### Macros with `$crate::` prefix.

The cleanest way to handle this situation is to use the `$crate::` prefix for macros, the same as
you would for any other path. Versions of the compiler >= 1.30 will handle this in both editions:

```rust,ignore
macro_rules! warn {
($msg:expr) => {
$crate::log!(stringify!($crate::LogLevel::Warn), $msg)
}
}

// ...
```

However, this will not work for older versions of the compiler that don't understand the
`$crate::` prefix for macros.

#### Macros using `local_inner_macros`

We also have the `local_inner_macros` modifier that we can add to our `#[macro_export]` attribute.
This has the advantage of working with older rustc versions (older versions just ignore the extra
modifier). The downside is that it's a bit messier:

```rust,ignore
#[macro_export(local_inner_macros)]
macro_rules! warn {
($msg:expr) => {
log!(stringify!($crate::LogLevel::Warn), $msg)
}
}
```

So the code knows to look for any macros used locally. But wait - this won't compile, because we
use the `stringify!` macro that isn't in our local crate (hence the convoluted example). The
solution is to add a level of indirection: we crate a macro that wraps stringify, but is local to
our crate. That way everything works in both editions (sadly we have to pollute the global
namespace a bit, but that's ok).

```rust,ignore
#[doc(hidden)]
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! my_special_stringify {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't want to see my_special_... in an actual crate. Could you come up with a naming convention that we can recommend to all uses of this pattern?

($($inner:tt)*) => {
stringify!($($inner)*)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the approach described here is intended to be picked up by all sorts of macros, I would write this call with curly braces.

    stringify! { $($inner)* }

Some macros cannot be forwarded with parentheses: playground. All macros can be forwarded with curly braces.

}
}
```

Here we're using the most general macro pattern possible, a list of token trees. We just pass
whatever tokens we get to the inner macro, and rely on it to report errors.

So the full 2015/2018 working example would be:

```rust,ignore
pub struct LogLevel {
Warn,
Error
}

#[doc(hidden)]
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! log {
($level:expr, $msg:expr) => {
println!("{}: {}", $level, $msg)
}
}

#[macro_export(local_inner_macros)]
macro_rules! warn {
($msg:expr) => {
log!(my_special_stringify!($crate::LogLevel::Warn), $msg)
}
}

#[macro_export(local_inner_macros)]
macro_rules! error {
($msg:expr) => {
log!(my_special_stringify!($crate::LogLevel::Error), $msg)
}
}

#[doc(hidden)]
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! my_special_stringify {
($($args:tt)*) => {
stringify!($($args)*)
}
}
```

Once everyone is using a rustc version >= 1.30, we can all just use the `$crate::` method (2015
crates are guaranteed to carry on compiling fine with later versions of the compiler). We need to
wait for package managers and larger organisations to update their compilers before this happens,
so in the mean time we can use the `local_inner_macros` method to support everybody. :)