From f1985d2d760a0b6119cb25d337d139919a456fa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Burka Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 00:24:22 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] finish updating RFC 1192 WRT single-ended ranges Fixes #1537 --- text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md b/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md index 7bef8c643c1..a6f619d47a1 100644 --- a/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md +++ b/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md @@ -79,8 +79,9 @@ winner. [discuss]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/vs-for-inclusive-ranges/1539 -This RFC doesn't propose non-double-ended syntax, like `a...`, `...b` -or `...` since it isn't clear that this is so useful. Maybe it is. +This RFC proposes single-ended syntax with only an end, `...b`, but not +with only a start (`a...`) or unconstrained `...`. This balance could be +reevaluated for usefulness and conflicts with other proposed syntax. The `Empty` variant could be omitted, leaving two options: