From a0afa5024b26f3d0fcea0a8d270398713fb1d089 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: est31 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 02:46:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Remove headers and amend the RFC --- 0000-template.md | 11 ----------- LICENSE-MIT | 2 -- text/2044-license-rfcs.md | 40 ++------------------------------------- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/0000-template.md b/0000-template.md index 130599118ed..fe9599a692b 100644 --- a/0000-template.md +++ b/0000-template.md @@ -1,14 +1,3 @@ - - - Feature Name: (fill me in with a unique ident, my_awesome_feature) - Start Date: (fill me in with today's date, YYYY-MM-DD) - RFC PR: (leave this empty) diff --git a/LICENSE-MIT b/LICENSE-MIT index 39d4bdb5acd..31aa79387f2 100644 --- a/LICENSE-MIT +++ b/LICENSE-MIT @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -Copyright (c) 2014 The Rust Project Developers - Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the diff --git a/text/2044-license-rfcs.md b/text/2044-license-rfcs.md index 9296a8a9a2b..d8f98953543 100644 --- a/text/2044-license-rfcs.md +++ b/text/2044-license-rfcs.md @@ -1,14 +1,3 @@ - - - Feature Name: license_rfcs - Start Date: 2017-06-26 - RFC PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2044 @@ -70,9 +59,6 @@ After this RFC has been merged, all new RFCs will be required to be dual-licensed under the MIT/Apache2. This includes RFCs currently being [considered for merging]. -This puts a responsibility on anyone who is merging RFCs to check for a -license header. - `README.md` should include a note that all contributions to the repo should be licensed under the new terms. @@ -81,28 +67,6 @@ created on rust-lang/rfcs with a list of past contributors to the repo, asking every contributor to agree to their contributions to be licensed under those terms. -To signify the terms, each RFC document shall start with a comment header like: - -``` - -``` - -All new RFCs, including the ones in the queue as of when this RFC gets merged, -should start with such a section, and the RFC template should be changed -accordingly. - -As more contributors sign off on the opened issue, sections may be added -to existing RFCs which have only contributors that have signed off. - Regarding non-RFC files in this repo, the intention is to get them licensed as well, not just the RFCs themselves. Therefore, contributors should be asked to license *all* their contributions to this repo, not just to the RFC files, @@ -121,8 +85,8 @@ Also, after this RFC got merged, all RFCs in the queue will get a comment in their Github PR and be asked to include the copyright section at the top of their RFC file. -The note in README.md and the header in the template should should inform new -PR authors of the terms they put their contribution under. +The note in README.md should should inform new PR authors of the terms +they put their contribution under. # Drawbacks [drawbacks]: #drawbacks