diff --git a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs index f5b9a7fac6fe..294c718d7e83 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs @@ -767,9 +767,6 @@ impl<'a, Cx: TypeCx> PlaceCtxt<'a, Cx> { fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &Constructor) -> usize { self.cx.ctor_arity(ctor, self.ty) } - fn ctors_for_ty(&self) -> Result, Cx::Error> { - self.cx.ctors_for_ty(self.ty) - } fn wild_from_ctor(&self, ctor: Constructor) -> WitnessPat { WitnessPat::wild_from_ctor(self.cx, ctor, self.ty.clone()) } @@ -822,7 +819,8 @@ impl fmt::Display for ValidityConstraint { } } -/// Data about a place under investigation. +/// Data about a place under investigation. Its methods contain a lot of the logic used to analyze +/// the constructors in the matrix. struct PlaceInfo { /// The type of the place. ty: Cx::Ty, @@ -833,6 +831,8 @@ struct PlaceInfo { } impl PlaceInfo { + /// Given a constructor for the current place, we return one `PlaceInfo` for each field of the + /// constructor. fn specialize<'a>( &'a self, cx: &'a Cx, @@ -846,6 +846,79 @@ impl PlaceInfo { is_scrutinee: false, }) } + + /// This analyzes a column of constructors corresponding to the current place. It returns a pair + /// `(split_ctors, missing_ctors)`. + /// + /// `split_ctors` is a splitted list of constructors that cover the whole type. This will be + /// used to specialize the matrix. + /// + /// `missing_ctors` is a list of the constructors not found in the column, for reporting + /// purposes. + fn split_column_ctors<'a>( + &self, + cx: &Cx, + ctors: impl Iterator> + Clone, + ) -> Result<(SmallVec<[Constructor; 1]>, Vec>), Cx::Error> + where + Cx: 'a, + { + let ctors_for_ty = cx.ctors_for_ty(&self.ty)?; + + // We treat match scrutinees of type `!` or `EmptyEnum` differently. + let is_toplevel_exception = + self.is_scrutinee && matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::NoConstructors); + // Whether empty patterns are counted as useful or not. We only warn an empty arm unreachable if + // it is guaranteed unreachable by the opsem (i.e. if the place is `known_valid`). + let empty_arms_are_unreachable = self.validity.is_known_valid() + && (is_toplevel_exception + || cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on() + || cx.is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on()); + // Whether empty patterns can be omitted for exhaustiveness. We ignore place validity in the + // toplevel exception and `exhaustive_patterns` cases for backwards compatibility. + let can_omit_empty_arms = empty_arms_are_unreachable + || is_toplevel_exception + || cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(); + + // Analyze the constructors present in this column. + let mut split_set = ctors_for_ty.split(ctors); + let all_missing = split_set.present.is_empty(); + + // Build the set of constructors we will specialize with. It must cover the whole type, so + // we add `Missing` to represent the missing ones. This is explained under "Constructor + // Splitting" at the top of this file. + let mut split_ctors = split_set.present; + if !(split_set.missing.is_empty() + && (split_set.missing_empty.is_empty() || empty_arms_are_unreachable)) + { + split_ctors.push(Constructor::Missing); + } + + // Which empty constructors are considered missing. We ensure that + // `!missing_ctors.is_empty() => split_ctors.contains(Missing)`. The converse usually holds + // except when `!self.validity.is_known_valid()`. + let mut missing_ctors = split_set.missing; + if !can_omit_empty_arms { + missing_ctors.append(&mut split_set.missing_empty); + } + + // Decide what constructors to report. + let is_integers = matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::Integers { .. }); + let always_report_all = self.is_scrutinee && !is_integers; + // Whether we should report "Enum::A and Enum::C are missing" or "_ is missing". + let report_individual_missing_ctors = always_report_all || !all_missing; + if !missing_ctors.is_empty() && !report_individual_missing_ctors { + // Report `_` as missing. + missing_ctors = vec![Constructor::Wildcard]; + } else if missing_ctors.iter().any(|c| c.is_non_exhaustive()) { + // We need to report a `_` anyway, so listing other constructors would be redundant. + // `NonExhaustive` is displayed as `_` just like `Wildcard`, but it will be picked + // up by diagnostics to add a note about why `_` is required here. + missing_ctors = vec![Constructor::NonExhaustive]; + } + + Ok((split_ctors, missing_ctors)) + } } impl Clone for PlaceInfo { @@ -1469,63 +1542,13 @@ fn compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness<'a, 'p, Cx: TypeCx>( }; }; - let ty = &place.ty.clone(); // Clone it out so we can mutate `matrix` later. - let pcx = &PlaceCtxt { cx: mcx.tycx, ty }; - debug!("ty: {:?}", pcx.ty); - let ctors_for_ty = pcx.ctors_for_ty()?; - - // We treat match scrutinees of type `!` or `EmptyEnum` differently. - let is_toplevel_exception = - place.is_scrutinee && matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::NoConstructors); - // Whether empty patterns are counted as useful or not. We only warn an empty arm unreachable if - // it is guaranteed unreachable by the opsem (i.e. if the place is `known_valid`). - let empty_arms_are_unreachable = place.validity.is_known_valid() - && (is_toplevel_exception - || mcx.tycx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on() - || mcx.tycx.is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on()); - // Whether empty patterns can be omitted for exhaustiveness. We ignore place validity in the - // toplevel exception and `exhaustive_patterns` cases for backwards compatibility. - let can_omit_empty_arms = empty_arms_are_unreachable - || is_toplevel_exception - || mcx.tycx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(); - // Analyze the constructors present in this column. + debug!("ty: {:?}", place.ty); let ctors = matrix.heads().map(|p| p.ctor()); - let mut split_set = ctors_for_ty.split(ctors); - let all_missing = split_set.present.is_empty(); - // Build the set of constructors we will specialize with. It must cover the whole type. - // We need to iterate over a full set of constructors, so we add `Missing` to represent the - // missing ones. This is explained under "Constructor Splitting" at the top of this file. - let mut split_ctors = split_set.present; - if !(split_set.missing.is_empty() - && (split_set.missing_empty.is_empty() || empty_arms_are_unreachable)) - { - split_ctors.push(Constructor::Missing); - } - - // Which constructors are considered missing. We ensure that `!missing_ctors.is_empty() => - // split_ctors.contains(Missing)`. The converse usually holds except when - // `!place_validity.is_known_valid()`. - let mut missing_ctors = split_set.missing; - if !can_omit_empty_arms { - missing_ctors.append(&mut split_set.missing_empty); - } - - // Decide what constructors to report. - let is_integers = matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::Integers { .. }); - let always_report_all = place.is_scrutinee && !is_integers; - // Whether we should report "Enum::A and Enum::C are missing" or "_ is missing". - let report_individual_missing_ctors = always_report_all || !all_missing; - if !missing_ctors.is_empty() && !report_individual_missing_ctors { - // Report `_` as missing. - missing_ctors = vec![Constructor::Wildcard]; - } else if missing_ctors.iter().any(|c| c.is_non_exhaustive()) { - // We need to report a `_` anyway, so listing other constructors would be redundant. - // `NonExhaustive` is displayed as `_` just like `Wildcard`, but it will be picked - // up by diagnostics to add a note about why `_` is required here. - missing_ctors = vec![Constructor::NonExhaustive]; - } + let (split_ctors, missing_ctors) = place.split_column_ctors(mcx.tycx, ctors)?; + let ty = &place.ty.clone(); // Clone it out so we can mutate `matrix` later. + let pcx = &PlaceCtxt { cx: mcx.tycx, ty }; let mut ret = WitnessMatrix::empty(); for ctor in split_ctors { // Dig into rows that match `ctor`.