From 515da7249e9420d9afc9b478f06ffb7f2f094954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Behrens Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:31:52 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Target::arch can take more than listed options A list of options in a comment like this is almost guaranteed to become out of date. This list is missing "riscv32" and "riscv64" and perhaps other architectures as well. --- src/librustc_target/spec/mod.rs | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/librustc_target/spec/mod.rs b/src/librustc_target/spec/mod.rs index 75821aba4706e..3054ffabb4f1f 100644 --- a/src/librustc_target/spec/mod.rs +++ b/src/librustc_target/spec/mod.rs @@ -497,8 +497,8 @@ pub struct Target { pub target_env: String, /// Vendor name to use for conditional compilation. pub target_vendor: String, - /// Architecture to use for ABI considerations. Valid options: "x86", - /// "x86_64", "arm", "aarch64", "mips", "powerpc", and "powerpc64". + /// Architecture to use for ABI considerations. Valid options include: "x86", + /// "x86_64", "arm", "aarch64", "mips", "powerpc", "powerpc64", and others. pub arch: String, /// [Data layout](http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#data-layout) to pass to LLVM. pub data_layout: String,