From 797f2479974bfe0d759f4a2bd51dfef95b8d75cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arthur Carcano Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:38:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Mark ZST as FFI-safe if all its fields are PhantomData Modify the linting behavior and add the corresponding regression test --- compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs | 46 ++++++++++---------- tests/ui/lint/lint-ffi-safety-all-phantom.rs | 22 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tests/ui/lint/lint-ffi-safety-all-phantom.rs diff --git a/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs b/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs index fa415243ba066..8bceae08a0387 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs @@ -878,39 +878,39 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ImproperCTypesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { ) -> FfiResult<'tcx> { use FfiResult::*; - if def.repr().transparent() { + let transparent_safety = def.repr().transparent().then(|| { // Can assume that at most one field is not a ZST, so only check // that field's type for FFI-safety. if let Some(field) = transparent_newtype_field(self.cx.tcx, variant) { - self.check_field_type_for_ffi(cache, field, substs) + return self.check_field_type_for_ffi(cache, field, substs); } else { // All fields are ZSTs; this means that the type should behave - // like (), which is FFI-unsafe + // like (), which is FFI-unsafe... except if all fields are PhantomData, + // which is tested for below FfiUnsafe { ty, reason: fluent::lint_improper_ctypes_struct_zst, help: None } } - } else { - // We can't completely trust repr(C) markings; make sure the fields are - // actually safe. - let mut all_phantom = !variant.fields.is_empty(); - for field in &variant.fields { - match self.check_field_type_for_ffi(cache, &field, substs) { - FfiSafe => { - all_phantom = false; - } - FfiPhantom(..) if def.is_enum() => { - return FfiUnsafe { - ty, - reason: fluent::lint_improper_ctypes_enum_phantomdata, - help: None, - }; - } - FfiPhantom(..) => {} - r => return r, + }); + // We can't completely trust repr(C) markings; make sure the fields are + // actually safe. + let mut all_phantom = !variant.fields.is_empty(); + for field in &variant.fields { + match self.check_field_type_for_ffi(cache, &field, substs) { + FfiSafe => { + all_phantom = false; } + FfiPhantom(..) if !def.repr().transparent() && def.is_enum() => { + return FfiUnsafe { + ty, + reason: fluent::lint_improper_ctypes_enum_phantomdata, + help: None, + }; + } + FfiPhantom(..) => {} + r => return transparent_safety.unwrap_or(r), } - - if all_phantom { FfiPhantom(ty) } else { FfiSafe } } + + if all_phantom { FfiPhantom(ty) } else { transparent_safety.unwrap_or(FfiSafe) } } /// Checks if the given type is "ffi-safe" (has a stable, well-defined diff --git a/tests/ui/lint/lint-ffi-safety-all-phantom.rs b/tests/ui/lint/lint-ffi-safety-all-phantom.rs new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..7419d34580097 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/lint/lint-ffi-safety-all-phantom.rs @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +// This is a regression test for issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106629. +// It ensures that transparent types where all fields are PhantomData are marked as +// FFI-safe. + +// check-pass + +#[repr(transparent)] +#[derive(Copy, Clone)] +struct MyPhantom(core::marker::PhantomData); + +#[repr(C)] +#[derive(Copy, Clone)] +pub struct Bar { + pub x: i32, + _marker: MyPhantom, +} + +extern "C" { + pub fn foo(bar: *mut Bar); +} + +fn main() {}