Deploy docs on stable only.

[ehuss]

This changes it so that docs are only updated during a stable release. This ensures users don't see unreleased changes, which can be confusing.

[ehuss]

#2477 should be merged before this, so that the published docs will get updated. After this is merged, I can follow up with a PR to revert #2477 (already prepared at https://github.com/ehuss/rustup/tree/add-unreleased-docs).

Or, if you don't want to bother with that dance (and you plan to do a new release soon), feel free to just close #2477.

[rbtcollins]

I think it would be nice to have a published copy of the master tree somewhere, like rust docs does of nightly, but stable should definitely be the default folk encounter

…

On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, 05:11 Eric Huss, ***@***.***> wrote: #2477 <#2477> should be merged before this, so that the published docs will get updated. After this is merged, I can follow up with a PR to revert #2477 <#2477> (already prepared at https://github.com/ehuss/rustup/tree/add-unreleased-docs).< /p> Or, if you don't want to bother with that dance (and you plan to do a new release soon), feel free to just close #2477 <#2477>. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2478 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADZ7XUGYRYMVEPLQ5RHN33SD7E2LANCNFSM4QVFRUDA> .

[ehuss]

Sure! Are you thinking just a different URL, like https://rust-lang.github.io/rustup/master/? And leave the root for stable?

I can probably put something like that together, though it'll take a little time.

[kinnison]

I'd love it if there were a /devel/ for the current master branch (We may rename the branch, so don't encode master in the URL)

[ehuss]

Sounds good! I'll try to put something together. The initial approach might be a little awkward since the docs don't yet exist on the stable branch.

[rbtcollins]

I'd be OK merging a point update to stable of just doc updates if that would be helpful.

…

On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, 07:01 Eric Huss, ***@***.***> wrote: Sounds good! I'll try to put something together. The initial approach might be a little awkward since the docs don't yet exist on the stable branch. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2478 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADZ7XQY4HULJHJI4G2YQLDSD7RWZANCNFSM4QVFRUDA> .

[kinnison]

I've merged the revert docs PR, and I'll merge this one after the docs have generated. Then I'm fine waiting until a release before we try for more complexity.

[kinnison]

OK docs have built so I'm merging this. I look forward to the docs reinstatement PR @ehuss