-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 563
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issues adding roborock s50 vacuum to HA and controlling from mirobo #456
Comments
This line evaluates the token from your configuration. Please check your token twice. Allowed characters are [0-9a-f]. The error is complaining about position 29. Did you use this ( |
Traceback:
Request:
Response:
Expected response:
|
Hi @syssi I have been using token 68694c446d626b734331764479435134 (I just replaced the last for characters here when posting) so the 29th position would be 68694c446d626b73433176447943[5]134 so it's definitely within hex range. To answer your second question I've never cleaned my room haha. This is an out of the box install :) Not sure if it makes a difference but I am using china FW roborock.vacuum.s5 v3.3.9_001710 |
Hi @syssi I decided to completely reset the device again and extract a new token (even though I'd done this a few times prior before posting). This time it's working fully in HA and mirobo! :) :) feel free to close this off. Thanks for everything!! |
I've read through all the known issues and literature I could find on the internet and I'm still struggling to get roborock v2 s50 working in home assistant or with python-miio.
I've used various token extraction techniques and the token is correct.
Using 'mirobo' some informational commands work:
Other control based commands do not:
I don't understand why some of the commands work but not others?
Now home assistant also has issues. After adding parameters to configuration.yaml the device won't show up and there are errors in the log. Namely the errors are:
The token is correct as I have been able to use mirobo in python to read some information?
Really appreciate any guidance that could be offered here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: