-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
many single-backticks should be double-backticks #38991
Conversation
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 15511a7; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
More similar issues can be found using
|
indeed, and it seems we have plenty that could also be fixed in this PR... |
OK, I'll spend a few minutes to do some more of these. |
This PR was originally a trivial edit, but now it's a patchbomb that hits about 60 files. Will we be able to merge it? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thank you.
src/sage/combinat/crystals/spins.pyx
Outdated
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ def CrystalOfSpinsPlus(ct): | |||
r""" | |||
Return the plus spin crystal of the given type D. | |||
|
|||
This is the crystal with highest weight `Lambda_n` (the | |||
This is the crystal with highest weight `\lambda_n` (the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original paper (Crystal Graphs for Representations of the q-Analogue of Classical Lie Algebras
M. Kashiwara, Toshiki Nakashima) uses uppercase Lambda (Λ) for fundamental weight. (Edit the occurrence above too.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the correction. I made the fix, so is it ok to restore to positive review?
Thanks! |
<!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> The docstring of `sage.combinat.posets.posets.FinitePoset` includes: ``` ``elements`` -- an optional list of elements, with ``element[i]`` corresponding to vertex ``i``. If ``elements`` is ``None``, then it is set to be the vertex set of the digraph. Note that if this option is set, then ``elements`` is considered as a specified linear extension of the poset and the `linear_extension` attribute is set. ``` In the last line, this PR changes the single-backticks around `linear_extension` to double-backticks. (Currently, `linear_extension` is typeset as latex math, so it is in italics and the "e" shows up as a subscript.) It also changes about 60 other similar problems. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> <!-- - sagemath#34567: ... --> URL: sagemath#38991 Reported by: DaveWitteMorris Reviewer(s): DaveWitteMorris, David Coudert, user202729
<!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> The docstring of `sage.combinat.posets.posets.FinitePoset` includes: ``` ``elements`` -- an optional list of elements, with ``element[i]`` corresponding to vertex ``i``. If ``elements`` is ``None``, then it is set to be the vertex set of the digraph. Note that if this option is set, then ``elements`` is considered as a specified linear extension of the poset and the `linear_extension` attribute is set. ``` In the last line, this PR changes the single-backticks around `linear_extension` to double-backticks. (Currently, `linear_extension` is typeset as latex math, so it is in italics and the "e" shows up as a subscript.) It also changes about 60 other similar problems. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> <!-- - sagemath#34567: ... --> URL: sagemath#38991 Reported by: DaveWitteMorris Reviewer(s): DaveWitteMorris, David Coudert, user202729
The docstring of
sage.combinat.posets.posets.FinitePoset
includes:In the last line, this PR changes the single-backticks around
linear_extension
to double-backticks. (Currently,linear_extension
is typeset as latex math, so it is in italics and the "e" shows up as a subscript.)It also changes about 60 other similar problems.
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies