You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It turns out that the destination port can be important. I can provide examples of several IPs which produce different JARM hash results depending on the port chosen. I believe the following changes would include logging of that port:
510: file.write('{"host":"' + destination_host + '","ip":"' + ip +'","destination_port":"' + str(destination_port) +'","result":"' + result + '"')
It turns out that the destination port can be important. I can provide examples of several IPs which produce different JARM hash results depending on the port chosen. I believe the following changes would include logging of that port:
510: file.write('{"host":"' + destination_host + '","ip":"' + ip +'","destination_port":"' + str(destination_port) +'","result":"' + result + '"')
512: file.write(destination_host + "," + ip + "," + str(destination_port) + "," + result)
528: sys.stdout.write('{"host":"' + destination_host + '","ip":"' + ip +'","destination_port":"' + str(destination_port) +'","result":"' + result + '"')
532: print("Port: " + str(destination_port))
536: sys.stdout.write('{"host":"' + destination_host + '","ip":null,"result":"' + result + '"')
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: