How to cite this package?

[juliohm]

Can you please share a bibtex entry for it?

[sefffal]

Hello @juliohm , I appreciate you citing it. I have not yet submitted it anywhere to get a DOI. I should do that.
In the meantime you could cite the documentation page as you would a website.
Thanks!

[juliohm]

Like this?

@misc{Thompson2023,
  author = {William Thompson},
  title = {{PairPlots.jl} Beautiful and flexible visualizations of high dimensional data},
  year = {2023},
  howpublished = {\url{https://sefffal.github.io/PairPlots.jl/dev}},
}

[sefffal]

Thanks, that’s perfect. I’ll try and submit it to JOSS for next time.

[juliohm]

You can also use Zenodo do cite software directly without waiting for the JOSS review period. Most packages have Zenodo with a valid DOI.

[juliohm]

Cited here: https://juliaearth.github.io/geospatial-data-science-with-julia/references.html#ref-Thompson2023

[sefffal]

Thank you! Book looks great BTW. What package did you use to generate the webpage?

[juliohm]

The book is open source and generated with Quarto. Check the github repo. Em ter., 31 de out. de 2023 10:38, William Thompson < ***@***.***> escreveu:

…

Thank you! Book looks great BTW. What package did you use to generate the webpage? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#21 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZQW3IFP7BNVDFIQGCS7O3YCD5MTAVCNFSM6AAAAAA4JMJ2ISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTOOBXGIZTOOJXGU> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[juliohm]

Regarding this issue, do you think we should add this BibTeX entry to the README already or wait for the JOSS submission?

[sefffal]

Thanks for the reminder; I'll wait for now and attempt a JOSS submission once my previous JuliaCon proceeding is accepted (JuliaCon/proceedings-review#126).

[ryanwhite1]

It's been a minute since this was last mentioned, but just wanted to check that the bibtex in the earlier comment is still the preferred method of citing?

[sefffal]

Thanks for checking; yeah that's still the preferred method. I'll probably generate a DOI sometime soon.