update to work with latest discord api and other misc fixes

[UpcraftLP]

• updated dependencies
• updated repository URL in metadata
• added missing ApplicationCommandOptionType options
• added resolved data to interaction context (needed for ex. file attachment arguments)
• made discord API BASE_URL public so it can be used outside the crate
• made it so people can run their own independent web server and only redirect specific paths to this crate's interaction handler, instead of being forced to use this crate's default implementation
• misc fixes
• bump version to 0.3.0

Important

Note that this PR does NOT address updating the test or examples files

[showengineer]

Nice! I am surprised the core of this crate still works after 2 years of not being developed (something with getting into university and getting a job, no time for hobby projects) . I'll look at your PR tonight.

[UpcraftLP]

Yeah it is very robust, and tbh I was simply too lazy to reimplement discord interactions 😅

And dw I know the grind.. To be honest I did not expect to get a response at all, so I'm positively surprised ^^

[showengineer]

PR looks good. We do have to update the examples but that seems like a quick fix. I'll check if I can fix that before merging.

[UpcraftLP]

fwiw

• here is also how I'm using the crate with a separate web server
• and here is how I'm handling attachments.

Those feel like they could use additional examples/documentation for new users ^^

[showengineer]

Nice! I was more or less referring to the current tests though, they fail atm.

[UpcraftLP]

Yeah I know. as stated in the original message I didn't touch those at all, so ofc they would break 😅

[showengineer]

The examples build fail somehow in the CI but I can't reproduce the errors on my own machine. They run and compile just fine. Is that the same for you?

[showengineer]

You know what f*ck it. I am merging this and we'll see if it breaks after merging.

[UpcraftLP]

The examples build fail somehow in the CI but I can't reproduce the errors on my own machine. They run and compile just fine. Is that the same for you?

no they very much fail to compile for me (as would be expected)