-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
First Draft of the README file completed.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
143 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,145 @@ | ||
# Mitchell_2022_CLVF_Gravity | ||
|
||
This repository contains all of the files required to reproduce the SimPEG gravity inversions run using the dataset from the CLVF. | ||
This repository contains all of the files required to reproduce the SimPEG gravity inversions of the CLVF field dataset. | ||
|
||
|
||
Gravity dataset | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
File names: groundGrav_Combined_zEllipsoid_Full.pkl | ||
groundGrav_Combined_zEllipsoid_Full.csv | ||
|
||
For this study, a regional CLVF gravity dataset was compiled that includes 2,929 gravity stations. Measurements | ||
used in this study include the dataset collected by Langenheim et al. (2006), datasets from | ||
Chapman and Bishop (1974), Youngs et al. (1985), and Smith (1992) compiled by Langenheim et al. (2006), and a | ||
2018 dataset collected in The Geysers (Peacock et al., 2020). All of the raw measurements were processed using | ||
the standard gravity reduction methods outlined in Blakely (1995) to produce the complete Bouguer anomaly (CBA) | ||
and isostatic residual gravity anomaly. The CBA includes the terrain correction, computed using BOUGUER | ||
(Godson and Plouff, 1988), which accounts for the gravitational attraction of terrain above sea level. The | ||
residual isostatic gravity anomaly, which accounts for regional variations in the upper mantle and lower crust | ||
that compensate topographic loads, were calculated in the manner of Simpson et al. (1986). Additional details | ||
regarding the standard USGS gravity reduction techniques used here can be found in Langenheim et al. (2006) and | ||
Langenheim et al. (2007). | ||
|
||
The field dataset is provided in two different formats (.csv and .pkl). Both datafiles were created from a Pandas | ||
Dataframe with 12 data columns: Station_ID, lonWGS84, latWGS84, xWGS84_UTM10N, yWGS84_UTM10N, zWGS84, OG, FAA, | ||
SBA, TTC, CBA, and ISO. | ||
|
||
Station_ID: Name/ID assigned to the gravity station | ||
lonWGS84: Longitude of the gravity station (CRS: WGS84) | ||
latWGS84: Latitude of the gravity station (CRS: WGS84) | ||
xWGS84_UTM10N: Easting of the gravity station [m] (CRS: WGS84, Zone 10N) | ||
yWGS84_UTM10N: Northing of the gravity station [m] (CRS: WGS84, Zone 10N) | ||
zWGS84: Height of the gravity station above the WGS84 ellipsoid [m] | ||
OG: Original (raw) gravity meansurement [mGal] | ||
FAA: Free-Air anomaly [mGal] | ||
SBA: Simple Bouguer Anomaly [mGal] | ||
TTC: Total Terrian Correction [mGal] | ||
CBA: Complete Bouguer Anomaly [mGal] | ||
ISO: Residual isostatic gravity anomaly [mGal] | ||
|
||
Gravity corrections were calculated using station locations based on the NAD27 CRS and the NVD29 vertical | ||
datum. Absoluted gravity measurements were calculated using the 1967 formula based on the IGSN71 datum. For | ||
consistency with the SRTM DEM gravity station locations were transformed into lat,lon and UTM coordinates | ||
based on the WGS84 CRS and the WGS84 ellipsoid. | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Mesh File | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
File name: GroundGravCombined_InvMesh_BaseCell_200_200_50_50kmPad.msh | ||
|
||
OcTree mesh file saved in UBC-GIF format. | ||
|
||
4096 4096 16384 # Number of base cells in x, y, and z directions | ||
107357.3290 3887596.6230 410325.0000 # Top SW corner of the mesh [m] | ||
200.000 200.000 50.000 # Base cell (smallest cell) size in x, y, and z directions [m] | ||
3575380 # Total number of cells in mesh | ||
1 1 1 2048 # i,j,k (indices of cell location) and cell size relative to base cell | ||
2049 1 1 2048 | ||
1 2049 1 2048 | ||
2049 2049 1 2048 | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Active Cells File | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
File name: actCellTopoInd_200_200_50.npy | ||
|
||
(# Cells,) Numpy boolean array which is True if the cell is active (below the topographic surface) and False | ||
if the cell is inactive (air cell above topography). | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Cell Weights File | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
File name: cellWeights_Depth.npy | ||
|
||
(# Active Cells,) Numpy array containing a cell weights for each active cell in the octree mesh. These cell | ||
weights are based off a depth weighting which counteracts the natural ( 1/z^2) decay of the gravity kernel | ||
function (Li and Oldenburg, 1998). | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Inversion Script | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
File name: Inv_PGI_grav_5units_depthWieght_TikhonovReg_dObsNeg.py | ||
|
||
Python script to setup and run the field dataset 5 unit Petrophysically and Geologically Guided Inversion | ||
(PGI) See Astic and Oldenburg, (2019) for details. | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Recovered Model File | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
File name: rhoInv_groundGravCombined_generalBounds_PGI5_depthWeight_dObsNeg.npy | ||
|
||
(# Cells,) Numpy array containing the recovered density contrast model from the 5 unit PGI. | ||
|
||
|
||
Predictive Data File | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
File name: dPred_mInv_groundGravCombined_generalBounds_PGI5_depthWeight_dObsNeg.npy | ||
|
||
(# Data,) Numpy array containing the predicted data from the recovered density contrast model. Data residuals | ||
can be calculated by subtracting these prediceted data from the observed data. | ||
|
||
|
||
References: | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
Astic, T., Oldenburg, D.W., 2019. A framework for petrophysically and geologically guided | ||
geophysical inversion using a dynamic Gaussian mixture model prior. Geophysical Journal | ||
International 219, 1989–2012. doi:10.1093/gji/ggz389. | ||
|
||
Blakely, R.J., 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge | ||
University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511549816. | ||
|
||
Chapman, R.H., Bishop, C.C., 1974. Bouguer gravity map of California, Santa Rosa sheet. | ||
Technical Report. | ||
|
||
Langenheim, V.E., Jachens, R.C., Morin, R.L., McCabe, C.A., 2007. Preliminary Gravity | ||
and Magnetic Data of the Lake Pillsbury Region, Northern Coast Ranges, California. | ||
Technical Report. U.S. Geological Survey. | ||
|
||
Godson, R.H., Plouff, D., 1988. BOUGUER Version 1.0 : a microcomputer gravity-terrain- | ||
correction program. Technical Report. U.S. Geological Survey. doi:10.3133/ofr88644B. | ||
|
||
Langenheim, V.E., Roberts, C.W., McCabe, C.A., McPhee, D.K., Tilden, J.E., Jachens, | ||
R.C., 2006. Preliminary Isostatic Gravity Map of the Sonoma Volcanic Field and Vicinity, | ||
Sonoma and Napa Counties, California. Technical Report. U.S. Geological Survey. doi:10. | ||
3133/ofr20061056. | ||
|
||
Li, Y., Oldenburg, D.W., 1998. 3-D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics 63, 109–119. | ||
doi:10.1190/1.1444302. | ||
|
||
Peacock, J.R., Earney, T.E., Mangan, M.T., Schermerhorn, W.D., Glen, J.M., Walters, M., | ||
Hartline, C., 2020. Geophysical characterization of the Northwest Geysers geothermal | ||
field, California. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 399, 106882. doi:10. | ||
1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.106882. | ||
|
||
Smith, N., 1992. Gravity interpretation of San Pablo Bay and vicinity, in: Wright, T.L. (Ed.), | ||
Field trip guide to Late Cenozoic geology in the North Bay region. Northern California | ||
Geologic Society, pp. 71–80. | ||
|
||
Youngs, L.R., Chapman, R.H., Chase, G.W., 1985. Complete Bouguer gravity and aeromag- | ||
netic maps with geology and thermal wells and springs of the Santa Rosa-Sonoma area, Sonoma | ||
and Napa counties, California. Technical Report. California Division of Mines and Geology. |