Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy Between Policy Table Languages and Supported Languages #1942

Closed
crokita opened this issue Dec 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Discrepancy Between Policy Table Languages and Supported Languages #1942

crokita opened this issue Dec 6, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@crokita
Copy link

crokita commented Dec 6, 2017

Description

I checked the RPC spec for the list of supported languages, and compared that list to the consumer messages policy object and noticed that there are languages in those messages that do not appear in the specification.

Reproduction Steps

I created a script which compared the list of supported languages to the list of languages that appeared in the policy table and used it to find differences.

These are the languages that are in the specification that are not used in the default policy table. This list is expected to contain languages.

   [ 'AR-SA',
     'CS-CZ',
     'DA-DK',
     'EL-GR',
     'EN-IN',
     'EN-SA',
     'FI-FI',
     'HE-IL',
     'HI-IN',
     'HU-HU',
     'ID-ID',
     'JA-JP',
     'KO-KR',
     'MS-MY',
     'NL-BE',
     'NO-NO',
     'RO-RO',
     'SK-SK',
     'TH-TH',
     'UK-UA',
     'VI-VN' ]

These are the languages that are in the policy table that are not defined in the specification. This list should be empty.

[ 'EN-IE', 'ES-EN' ] 
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants