You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What should be considered as master copy of Iglu registry?
We have two possible options:
Iglu registry is just original Schemas, all derived assets (like Redshift DDLs not derived from JSON Schemas) are secondary, thus can be generated automatically
Iglu registry is set of all Schemas it contains, no matter whether they're original or derived from other.
This question is really boils down to what we expect from derivation tools like igluctl static generate. If we expect them to be ideal, them we need to stick with first option, otherwise if human-interaction is unavoidable then we need to chose second option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
alexanderdean
changed the title
Common: decide about master-copy of Iglu
Common: introduce the concept of an "origin" schema format to Iglu
Sep 1, 2016
What should be considered as master copy of Iglu registry?
We have two possible options:
This question is really boils down to what we expect from derivation tools like
igluctl static generate
. If we expect them to be ideal, them we need to stick with first option, otherwise if human-interaction is unavoidable then we need to chose second option.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: