Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider panel dependencies and perhaps adjust timing #135

Closed
RubenVerborgh opened this issue Sep 7, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Consider panel dependencies and perhaps adjust timing #135

RubenVerborgh opened this issue Sep 7, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
@justinwb @Mitzi-Laszlo
Labels
question Question regarding composition or execution of the process as defined in this repository.

Comments

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Contributor

RubenVerborgh commented Sep 7, 2019 •
edited
Loading

No description provided.

@RubenVerborgh RubenVerborgh added the question Question regarding composition or execution of the process as defined in this repository. label Sep 7, 2019
@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Case in point: solid/authorization-panel#33

This was referenced Sep 7, 2019
Closed
Open
@justinwb
Copy link
Member

justinwb commented Sep 8, 2019

I agree that we need overarching focus and coordination, and I think that we can work within the structures that we’ve got now to guide and encourage that work - and achieve the milestones that are most important to Solid (chiefly the v1.0 specification).

I believe that part of the responsibility of the editorial team is to be proactive in providing this guidance and coordination, so I'm going to propose a project under the scope of https://github.com/solid/specification, primarily assigned to editors, to undertake this.

@justinwb justinwb mentioned this issue Sep 8, 2019
Open
@Mitzi-Laszlo
Copy link
Contributor

In practice the authentication, interoperability, and authorisation panel are the only active panels. Let's create a one stop shop page on the W3C Wiki with an overview of panel calls to make it easy for everyone to keep track.

@Mitzi-Laszlo Mitzi-Laszlo reopened this Jul 2, 2020
@Mitzi-Laszlo
Copy link
Contributor

Also, perhaps it's an idea to close inactive panels for now.

Mitzi-Laszlo added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2020
@Mitzi-Laszlo
De-list inactive panels for now
b9a6ef1 
When panels were first introduced there was a wild proliferation of panels. This resulted in some trouble keeping track of what was going on as mentioned in #135 

In the process it states that "Panel repositories that are inactive for more than six months may be archived by Solid Administrators." 

With this pull request, the inactive panels have been removed. This does NOT mean that the topics are unimportant or that they should not be picked up at a later stage. It
@Mitzi-Laszlo Mitzi-Laszlo mentioned this issue Jul 2, 2020
Merged
@Mitzi-Laszlo
Copy link
Contributor

#208

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@justinwb justinwb

@Mitzi-Laszlo Mitzi-Laszlo

Labels
question Question regarding composition or execution of the process as defined in this repository.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@justinwb @RubenVerborgh @Mitzi-Laszlo