Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

腾讯的混元模型 API 接口更新了 #1452

Closed
5 tasks done
IAn2018cs opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1542
Closed
5 tasks done

腾讯的混元模型 API 接口更新了 #1452

IAn2018cs opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1542
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@IAn2018cs
Copy link

例行检查

  • 我已确认目前没有类似 issue
  • 我已确认我已升级到最新版本
  • 我已完整查看过项目 README,已确定现有版本无法满足需求
  • 我理解并愿意跟进此 issue,协助测试和提供反馈
  • 我理解并认可上述内容,并理解项目维护者精力有限,不遵循规则的 issue 可能会被无视或直接关闭

功能描述
适配新的接口请求,相关文档:https://cloud.tencent.com/document/api/1729/105701

@IAn2018cs IAn2018cs added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2024
@shown1985
Copy link

接口完全变了似乎

@ethanzhao2001
Copy link

我也发现改了,想白嫖lite模型,希望尽快适配

@tisfeng
Copy link
Contributor

tisfeng commented Jun 4, 2024

有点坑,因为之前腾讯宣布 lite 模型免费了,所以我最近一直在使用 hunyuan-lite 模型。

直到今天看到【腾讯云】的扣费账单才发现,原来目前 one-api 的腾讯混元渠道不支持 hunyuan-lite 模型,导致我自己添加的自定义模型 hunyuan-lite 实际走的还是 hunyuan-pro 😑

没有仔细看代码实现,但我觉得这种设计不太妥,如果渠道不支持 hunyuan-lite 模型,应该直接报错提示,而不是偷偷改用别的模型,这样很可能会导致一些潜在问题。(希望不是腾讯 API 搞的鬼 😥)

image image

songquanpeng pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2024
* feat: 支持v3最新协议的腾讯混元(#1452)

* feat: 支持Spark4.0 Ultra

---------

Co-authored-by: lihangfu <hfli8@iflytek.com>
jinjianming pushed a commit to jinjianming/one-api that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
* feat: 支持v3最新协议的腾讯混元(songquanpeng#1452)

* feat: 支持Spark4.0 Ultra

---------

Co-authored-by: lihangfu <hfli8@iflytek.com>
mxdlzg pushed a commit to mxdlzg/one-api that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2024
* feat: 支持v3最新协议的腾讯混元(songquanpeng#1452)

* feat: 支持Spark4.0 Ultra

---------

Co-authored-by: lihangfu <hfli8@iflytek.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants