Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[portsorch] add buffer drop FC group #1368

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

mykolaf
Copy link
Collaborator

@mykolaf mykolaf commented Jul 28, 2020

Signed-off-by: Mykola Faryma mykolaf@mellanox.com

Do not merge yet, as this also needs a SAI impl update

What I did
Introduce separate FC group for port level buffer drop counters as discussed in Azure#1308
Why I did it

How I verified it

Details if related

Signed-off-by: Mykola Faryma <mykolaf@mellanox.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@daall daall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, will wait on SAI updates/draft status to approve. Thank you! :)

@daall
Copy link
Contributor

daall commented Aug 13, 2020

retest vs please

@daall daall merged commit 2267071 into sonic-net:master Aug 20, 2020
@daall
Copy link
Contributor

daall commented Aug 21, 2020

@mykolaf I also missed until I took a closer look at the 201911 PR: I think "PORT_BUFFER_DROP" in FlexCounterOrch should refer to PORT_BUFFER_DROP_STAT_FLEX_COUNTER_GROUP instead of PORT_STAT_COUNTER_FLEX_COUNTER_GROUP. It doesn't look like it effects the behavior, but we should probably fix it to be consistent.

EdenGri pushed a commit to EdenGri/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2022
…onic-net#1368)

* Skip records of FDB entries, which are linked to default Vlan 1,
  to prevent exception throwing while performing
  command 'show mac' or 'fdbshow'.

Signed-off-by: Maksym Belei <Maksym_Belei@jabil.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants