-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is the chef-provisioning cookbook a dependency? #139
Comments
dpkp
changed the title
Is chef-provisioning a dependency?
Is the chef-provisioning cookbook a dependency?
Mar 7, 2015
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
metadata.rb lists the chef-provisioning cookbook as a dependency. But it seems like the only relation to chef-provisioning is that it is a recommended way to use consul-cookbook (via cluster.rb). Indeed the Usage docs for consul:
does not use the chef-provisioning cookbook -- it uses a simple gem install. So it seems odd to make installing the chef-provisioning cookbook a requirement for using consul-cookbook.
If
suggests
is broken, perhaps there is an alternative keyword likerecommends
that would work instead? Or maybe the chef-provisioning cookbook doesn't belong in metadata.rb at all?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: