Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
33 lines (20 loc) · 2.24 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

33 lines (20 loc) · 2.24 KB

Bytecode Alliance RFCs

This respository is the home of the RFC (request for comments) process for Bytecode Alliance projects. RFCs are a tool for getting feedback on design and implementation ideas and for consensus-building among stakeholders.

What is an RFC?

An RFC is a markdown file laying out a problem and a proposed solution. To support getting feedback early on, RFCs can come in draft or complete forms (see the linked templates for details). Draft RFCs should be opened as draft PRs. In either case, discussion happens by opening a pull request to place the RFC's markdown file into the accepted directory.

When is an RFC needed?

Many changes to Bytecode Alliance projects can and should happen through every-day GitHub processes: issues and pull requests. An RFC is warranted when:

  • The work involves changes that will significantly affect stakeholders or project contributors. Each project may provide more specific guidance. Examples include:
    • Major architectural changes
    • Major new features
    • Simple changes that have significant downstream impact
    • Changes that could affect guarantees or level of support, e.g. removing support for a target platform
    • Changes that could affect mission alignment, e.g. by changing properties of the security model
  • The work is substantial and you want to get early feedback on your approach.

Workflow

Creating and discussing an RFC

  • The RFC process begins by submitting a (possibly draft) pull request, using one of the two templates available in the repository root. The pull request should propose to add a single markdown file into the accepted subdirectory, following the template format, and with a descriptive name.

  • The pull request is tagged with a project label designating the Bytecode Alliance project it targets.

  • Once an RFC PR is open, stakeholders and project contributors will discuss it together with the author, raising any points of concern, exploring tradeoffs, and honing the design.

Making a decision: merge or close

TBD, see the first RFC.