You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to send a model in Revit 2023 with roofs and gutters. When sending "everything", the gutters are not converted. However, when selecting them and sending "selection", they are converted correctly.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Create a Revit model with gutters and roofs
Click on Send everything
Open the stream on Speckle
See that the gutters are missing
Expected behavior
We would expect the gutters also to be streamed when sending "everything"
The category OST_Gutter has not been added. When manually adding OST_Gutter with the id -2001391, the Gutters are correctly converted even when sending "everything".
I do not understand what exactly is going on in GetOrInitializeWithDefaultFactory, so I can neither propose a solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
They are exported when selected explicitly and sent by "Selection." So they should be supported, shouldn't they? The sending "forgets" them when sending "everything."
Prerequisites
What package are you referring to?
Backend
Describe the bug
I am trying to send a model in Revit 2023 with roofs and gutters. When sending "everything", the gutters are not converted. However, when selecting them and sending "selection", they are converted correctly.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
We would expect the gutters also to be streamed when sending "everything"
Proposed Solution
The error is somewhere in
ConnectorRevitUtils
:speckle-sharp/ConnectorRevit/ConnectorRevit/ConnectorRevitUtils.cs
Lines 70 to 75 in 149d35e
The category
OST_Gutter
has not been added. When manually adding OST_Gutter with the id-2001391
, the Gutters are correctly converted even when sending "everything".I do not understand what exactly is going on in
GetOrInitializeWithDefaultFactory
, so I can neither propose a solution.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: