Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Peer Review - Clearer acceptance criteria for maintainable and adaptable codebase #227

Open
Tracked by #252
calvynsiong opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #252

Peer Review - Clearer acceptance criteria for maintainable and adaptable codebase #227

calvynsiong opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@Sevhena
Labels
peer-review Feedback from peers vnv-plan Related to the VnV Plan (Deliverable 4)

Comments

@calvynsiong
Copy link

Artifact Under Review
3.2.5

Team Number for Team Doing the Review

3

Description of Issue

I think the acceptance criteria could be more strictly defined, as adjectives like modular and maintainable can be a little subjective. Maybe following a specific code/style standard would help.

image
@Sevhena Sevhena added peer-review Feedback from peers vnv-plan Related to the VnV Plan (Deliverable 4) labels Nov 7, 2024
@Sevhena Sevhena self-assigned this Nov 7, 2024
@Sevhena Sevhena moved this to Todo in SCO - Project Board Nov 7, 2024
@Sevhena Sevhena mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2024
Open
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Sevhena Sevhena

Labels
peer-review Feedback from peers vnv-plan Related to the VnV Plan (Deliverable 4)
Projects
SCO - Project Board
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

vnvp-peer-review ssm-lab/capstone--source-code-optimizer
2 participants
@calvynsiong @Sevhena