Parameter combination logic

[gaow]

By default we adopt Cartesian product logic when combining parameters. This behavior can be adjusted either grouping parameters together:

n_df: (100,2), (1000, 4)

Or apply @FILTER:

n: 100, 1000
df: 2, 4
@FILTER: (n = 100 and df = 2) or (n = 1000 and df = 4)

A proposed syntax is:

(n, df): (100, 2), (1000, 4)

I will implement this behavior if deemed reasonable.

[stephens999]

I like the proposed syntax, at least for scalar parameters.

…

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:04 PM, gaow ***@***.***> wrote: By default we adopt Cartesian product logic when combining parameters. This behavior can be adjusted either grouping parameters together: n_df: (100,2), (1000, 4) Or apply @filter: n: 100, 1000 df: 2, 4 @filter: (n = 100 and df = 2) or (n = 1000 and df = 4) A proposed syntax is: (n, df): (100, 2), (1000, 4) I will implement this behavior if deemed reasonable. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#92>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABt4xd9UfbQYs_sm_MArfDDQaiJDjA-Tks5tZEOYgaJpZM4SVY39> .

[pcarbo]

@gaow Seems reasonable to me.

[gaow]

This is now supported, though need more unit tests to cover all steps this change may have affected.