From 5e39e53158b1ec490253b4f3c80f17cde955ca02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pramod Sharma Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:00:41 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Typo fix --- docs/AccessControl.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/AccessControl.rst b/docs/AccessControl.rst index eb45010656ab8..1ab2ae269d075 100644 --- a/docs/AccessControl.rst +++ b/docs/AccessControl.rst @@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ Swift does not currently support private protocol conformances, so for runtime consistency, the access level of the conformance of type T to protocol P is equal to the minimum of T's access level and P's access level; that is, the conformance is accessible whenever both T and P are accessible. This does not -change if the protocol is conformed to in an extension. (The access level of a +change if the protocol is conformed to in an extension (The access level of a conformance is not currently reflected in the source, but is a useful concept -for applying restrictions consistently.) +for applying restrictions consistently.). All members used to satisfy a conformance must have an access level at least as high as the conformance's. This ensures consistency between views of the type;