From 549263dec2610aa79688910bcac3a25bdfa5f199 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: codester Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 22:56:51 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] updated spelling mistake of intead Updated spelling of instaed to instead --- docs/Pattern Matching.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/Pattern Matching.rst b/docs/Pattern Matching.rst index 3e4fee73f96c6..f12c71c2112b2 100644 --- a/docs/Pattern Matching.rst +++ b/docs/Pattern Matching.rst @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ pattern-specific production. I believe it should be true that, in general, match patterns for a production accept a strict superset of valid expressions, so that (e.g.) we do not need to disambiguate whether an open paren starts a tuple expression or a tuple pattern, -but can instaed just aggressively parse as a pattern. Note that +but can instead just aggressively parse as a pattern. Note that binary operators can mean that, using this strategy, we sometimes have to retroactively rewrite a pattern as an expression.