[Runtime] Don't check suppressed protocols when the extended existential is metatype constrained #84921
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…atype constrained
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
al45tair
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When checking the generic requirements of a type and its generic arguments, we have to check that an extended existential doesn't invert some protocols that the bound generic type isn't expecting. However, for extended existentials that are metatypes, e.g.
any (~Copyable & ~Escapable).Typeorany Collection<Int>.Type, they are always copyable and escapable. Don't do inverse protocol requirement checking on these.Resolves: rdar://153105845