-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
increasing sensitivity wont increase speed more #13
Comments
Can you please post your config and tell me, how you raised your sens? Did you maybe also apply a speed-cap? |
the sensitivity value does nothing, and its redundant anyway. so we need to set prescaler to starting value then use acceleration and speedcap to control and if we have both i would suggest to update help text in config file to let people set prescaler to 1000dpi not 400 |
The sensitivity value in fact does something but its meaning is rather subtle and mostly not clear to people. I will also most likely not change the behavior right now (regarding your 400 or 1000 DPI comment). I am currently in a rewrite of the code anyway, which will allow more curves and will get leetmouse closer to rawaccel. That process (getting closer to rawaccel) anyway means, moving to their config variables sooner or later. But I have to ETA there yet. |
ive learnt that decreasing acceleration actually increases it ill post an update in a few hours, please remindme
…On Wed, Jun 22, 2022, 00:51 Klaus ***@***.***> wrote:
The sensitivity value in fact does something but its meaning is rather
subtle and mostly not clear to people.
On the other hand, PreScale(X/Y) is like a pre-applied sensitivity factor
and that is what people might be mostly looking for. RawAccel (on Windows)
merged both together which made me a bit unhappy: I for example created a
(for me perfect) curve using one specific mouse by mostly tweaking
"Sensitivity". When using another mouse of different DPI, I just touched
the PreScaleX/Y to "scale up" that other mouses "DPI" counts to the one I
created my previous curve with. That made that mouse feel the same and this
is also, why this is still in the code.
I will also most likely not change the behavior right now. I am currently
in a rewrite of the code anyway, which will allow more curves and will get
leetmouse closer to rawaccel. That process (getting closer to rawaccel)
anyway means, moving to their config variables sooner or later. But I have
to ETA there yet.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOUJCT7SOROYRX7VUF5AZSTVQII23ANCNFSM5SVQME7Q>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Yes, in fact, that value appears in the denominator of the full equation in the end. I will attach the formula for the code in a second in a readable way. This is the math behind it (sort of reduced). |
im sorry but this is indeed redundant. anything you can achieve with sensitvity can be achieved with tweaking acceleration itself. however keep in mind that both, accelerations as your "sensitivity" will have different results on different dpi even with prescale this is the reason why rawaccel now has a new feature, that is the normalize checkbox in the USB device settings. this way you can truly run different dpi with the same curve settings and the same result. anyway i still dont see any good reason for that sensitivity value. not saying you should change it, but based on the math here it just is redundant and also the description is kind of confusing. as for your mouse curve, you could simply divide your acceleration factor by what you have set in sensitivity to achieve the same effect. that wont change with any other mouse either any better or worse. |
ive raised the sens by 4x and it still it slow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: