-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing deprecated fields #1040
Removing deprecated fields #1040
Conversation
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
e2463ef
to
185c6e9
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
185c6e9
to
4d7a3f0
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
4d7a3f0
to
1f2a889
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
1f2a889
to
ae0a0b9
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
The reduction in test coverage in the defaults package is due to the removal of code that was covered at 100% (higher than the rest of the file). Any other test changes made in this PR would be unrelated to the removal of the deprecated fields. |
The only thing I see left here is if we want to call out the |
/test pull-tekton-triggers-build-tests |
ae0a0b9
to
67ab0f2
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/assign @iancoffey |
This LGTM. We should decide which release we are intending to remove these fields. |
/lgtm , pending release decision |
I think this can make it to the v0.14 release. Just needs a rebase and then good to go. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
67ab0f2
to
cc0afaa
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
cc0afaa
to
24c4728
Compare
this PR should be good to go now for the release. everything has been cleaned up. Should we write a document specific to migrating to this version given the removal of these fields? |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
Closes tektoncd#904 This PR removes the deprecated ServiceType and PodTemplate fields from the EventListener Spec
24c4728
to
d9ddf9d
Compare
/test pull-tekton-triggers-go-coverage |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/test pull-tekton-triggers-go-coverage |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/lgtm |
Changes
Closes #904
This PR removes the deprecated ServiceType and PodTemplate fields from the EventListener Spec
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
See the contribution guide for more details.
Release Notes