Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hide several links for orcharhino builds #3512

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?

hide links for orcharhino builds

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

due to weird downstream issues

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

changes are cherry-picked from a downstream-only stable branch -> no tech review/ACK by anyone from ATIX necessary

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

Copy link

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective labels Dec 12, 2024
@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb merged commit 4b99e69 into theforeman:master Dec 12, 2024
9 checks passed
@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb deleted the hide_links_orcharhino branch December 12, 2024 14:11
maximiliankolb added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
@maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged to "master" and cherry-picked to "3.13":
7b0f76d..91985b4 3.13 -> 3.13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants