Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add troubleshooting rex timeout due to yggdrasil version (3.11 and earlier) #3522

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 3.11
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

asteflova
Copy link
Member

@asteflova asteflova commented Dec 12, 2024

What changes are you introducing?

See #3516

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

See #3516

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

I opened #3516 for nightly, 3.13, and 3.12: the migration package will get included upstream there.

For 3.11 and below, this will be applicable only to Satellite where the client repo is unversioned.

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

@asteflova asteflova changed the base branch from master to 3.11 December 12, 2024 15:28
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 12, 2024

The PR preview for f624cbb is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-3522.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

@asteflova asteflova force-pushed the SAT-27476_yggdrasil_troubleshooting_3-11 branch from d11ab3e to f624cbb Compare December 12, 2024 15:36
@asteflova
Copy link
Member Author

This matches the update in #3516, except that a Satellite conditional is added on top of that, so I'll add style review done.

@asteflova asteflova added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Dec 12, 2024
@asteflova
Copy link
Member Author

I confirmed that this mirrors the expected state on the code side, so I'll add tech review done. And also waiting for code while we wait for packaging PRs.

@asteflova asteflova added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Not yet reviewed style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant