Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix example value for Hammer CLI #3524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?

fix placeholder value for Hammer CLI

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

consistency

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

Copy link

@asteflova asteflova added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective labels Dec 13, 2024
@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb merged commit 6186ff1 into theforeman:master Dec 13, 2024
9 checks passed
@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb deleted the fix_example_value branch December 13, 2024 13:45
maximiliankolb added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
@maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged to "master" and cherry-picked:
2ca8f0a..c827a5f 3.13 -> 3.13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants