This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
Mine n blocks, skip blocks #102
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Oct 13, 2024
This was referenced Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I made two methods:
evm_mineBlocks:- Mines multiple blocks. Accepts one arguments: number of blocks to mine.evm_skipBlocks:Will create one block with fake block number. Takes one argument: number of blocks you want to add on top of current block height. Useful when testing big block-number based constraints (eg. it would take ~1h to mine 500k blocks). It is not guaranteed that everything will this function, so you should save a snapshot of the blockchain before calling this function, then revert afterwards. Should be mainly used for checking block-number based constraints.