Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducibility #3

Open
xternalz opened this issue Jun 28, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Reproducibility #3

xternalz opened this issue Jun 28, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@xternalz
Copy link

I can't seem to reproduce the Set5 (x4) result reported, using the default training options with --cuda. Do you have any idea?

@twtygqyy
Copy link
Owner

@xternalz Were you able to reproduce x8 result? The training options should be same as x8 as I implemented. You can also test x2's performance when training x4

@FYXX
Copy link

FYXX commented Jul 8, 2017

I also can't reproduce the Set5 (x4) result reported, using the default training options with --cuda.

@ZhangDY827
Copy link

Hi, I meet the same problem. I train the weight file using the the default training options with --cuda, the results on Set5(x4) were even worse than bicubic. But I can reproduce the result with the weight file you provided in folder model . Can you give me some advice. Thanks a lot.

@twtygqyy
Copy link
Owner

twtygqyy commented Sep 17, 2017

@FYXX @CasdDesnDR Did you generate the training file with the script I provided here https://github.com/twtygqyy/pytorch-LapSRN/tree/master/data ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants