Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Issue 593: Remove owl:onDatatype from vocabulary definitions #628

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Issue 593: Remove owl:onDatatype from vocabulary definitions #628

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist commented Aug 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This Pull Request resolves all requirements of Issue #593 .

Coordination

  • Pull Request is against correct branch
  • Pull Request is in, or reverted to, Draft status before Solutions Approval vote has passed
  • CI passes in UCO feature branch against develop
  • CI passes in UCO current unstable branch (78c3bb4)
  • CI passes in CASE current unstable branch tracking UCO's unstable as submodule (5c608e4)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for CASE-Corpora
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for CASE-Corpora (N/A)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for CASE-Examples
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for CASE-Examples (N/A)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for casework.github.io
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for casework.github.io (N/A)
  • Milestone linked
  • Solutions Approval vote logged on corresponding Issue (once logged, can be taken out of Draft PR status)

@ajnelson-nist
Remove owl:onDatatype from vocabulary definitions
becf55e 
References:
* #593

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist added this to the UCO 1.4.0 milestone Aug 9, 2024
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist changed the title Remove owl:onDatatype from vocabulary definitions Issue 593: Remove owl:onDatatype from vocabulary definitions Aug 9, 2024
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2024
Closed
18 tasks
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist linked an issue Aug 9, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
UCO semi-open vocabularies seem to use owl:onDatatype incorrectly #593
Closed
18 tasks
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Merged
1 task
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2024 15:39
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist requested a review from a team October 15, 2024 15:39
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

Sorry, need to catch up to do develop to incorporate an extra update.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as draft October 15, 2024 15:41
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2024 17:09
@plbt5 plbt5 merged commit fe4c001 into develop Oct 16, 2024
1 check passed
@plbt5 plbt5 deleted the Feature-Issue-593 branch October 16, 2024 05:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@plbt5 plbt5 plbt5 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Change Proposal
Projects
None yet
Milestone
UCO 1.4.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

UCO semi-open vocabularies seem to use owl:onDatatype incorrectly
2 participants
@ajnelson-nist @plbt5