diff --git a/rfcs/features/0031-vc-api/README.md b/rfcs/features/0031-vc-api/README.md index db8d7818..62e26047 100644 --- a/rfcs/features/0031-vc-api/README.md +++ b/rfcs/features/0031-vc-api/README.md @@ -9,15 +9,21 @@ ## Summary -One paragraph explanation of the feature. +Once emerging standard for interactions between verifiable credential agents +is the w3c vc-api. This RFC proposes creating an express router that can be +added to a vckit/veramo agent such that it exposes agent methods via the +vc-api interface. ## Motivation Why are we doing this? What use cases does it support? What is the expected outcome? -## Tutorial +- interoperability +- expected outcome is the be able to register for and pass vc-api interop test suite. +## Tutorial +``` Explain the proposal as if it were already implemented and you were teaching it to another vc-kit contributor or vc-kit consumer. That generally means: @@ -31,6 +37,16 @@ migration guidance. Some enhancement proposals may be more aimed at contributors (e.g. for consensus internals); others may be more aimed at consumers. +``` +> TODO: elaborate on tutorial dot points below + +- overview of vc-api operations +- mapping to agent methods +- request / response structure mappings +- authorization +- testing conformance +- agent configuration +- api-docs and example requests ## Reference @@ -47,6 +63,8 @@ Strive to guarantee that: Why should we *not* do this? +- still draft/experimental spec + ## Rationale and alternatives - Why is this design the best in the space of possible designs? @@ -54,6 +72,15 @@ Why should we *not* do this? choosing them? - What is the impact of not doing this? +- there are multiple other alternatives for interactions between agents, but + no single standardised approach. a large part of the justification for the + choice of veramo as a foundation for vc-kit is it's modularity. The vc-api + is an easy win to begin demonstrating conformance / interop with other vc + implementations. + +- also forms a foundation for extending to implement the traceability interop + api spec. + ## Prior art Discuss prior art, both the good and the bad, in relation to this proposal.