Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
75 lines (57 loc) · 3.71 KB

nuclear-lifecycle-co2.md

File metadata and controls

75 lines (57 loc) · 3.71 KB
layout title category description author image mathjax byline date
default
Nuclear energy is low-carbon energy
blog
The nuclear fission reactions that underlie nuclear energy don't create any CO₂ whatsoever. However, some is emitted during planning, mining, construction, operation, decommissioning, and waste disposal. Countless studies have analyzed this full cradle-to-grave lifecycle, establishing a powerful consensus that nuclear power is indeed low-carbon energy.
nick
/img/nuclear-lifecycle.png
true
true
2022-12-04

{{ page.description }}

Nuclear low carbon plot{: .img-fluid }

For reference, solar photovoltaic lifecycle emissions are around 40 gCO₂-eq/kWh.

All low carbon plot{: .img-fluid }

Fossil fuel and biofuel energy systems work by combusting a carbon-based fuel in the presence of oxygen. A reaction between molecular electrons occurs, forming CO₂, water, and energy, among other combustion products. Excess CO₂ in the atmosphere causes excess energy from the sun to be captured, causing global warming. The basic equation for combustion is:

$$\text{Hydrocarbon} + \text{O}_2 + \text{spark} \rightarrow \text{H}2\text{O} + \text{CO}{2} + \text{energy}$$

Nuclear energy systems work by breaking nuclear bonds in uranium via neutron-induced fission chain reactions. The basic equation is:

$$\text{Uranium} + \text{neutron} \rightarrow \text{2 fission products} + \text{energy}$$

The small amount of carbon emissions related to nuclear then come from different aspects of the overall lifecycle. An example of where exactly the carbon emissions come from may be found in Vattenfall's lifecycle analysis:

Vattenfall nuclear LCA{: .img-fluid }

Zero carbon or low carbon?

It's reasonable to claim that processes that don't inherently require the production of CO₂ to be zero-carbon processes, including solar photovoltaic, hydropower, wind, and nuclear. As we continue decarbonizing, energy systems that use these will be increasingly closer to zero carbon systems. They're zero carbon in the asymptote.

No energy system today is truly zero-carbon because of all the carbon-based energy we still use. It's reasonable to call anything with under 50 g CO₂-eq/kWh a low-carbon energy source.

{: .alert .alert-danger} Heads up: Anti-nuclear institutions and groups have made several attempts to cast doubt on the low-carbon nature of nuclear power. One tried including the carbon impact of nuclear war. Several such studies have been formally retracted from their journals.

References