Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defining a versioning and branching strategy #895

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2021

Conversation

david-waltermire
Copy link
Contributor

Committer Notes

This PR proposes a repository versioning and branching strategy to address the discussion #853.

This is a work in progress for early discussion.

All Submissions:

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Do all automated CI/CD checks pass?

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?
  • Have you updated all OSCAL website and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the OSCAL website can be made in the docs/content directory of your branch.

@david-waltermire david-waltermire marked this pull request as ready for review May 4, 2021 15:25
@david-waltermire david-waltermire force-pushed the 853-version-and-branching-strategy branch from 02ec3fc to 04e376c Compare May 4, 2021 15:28
@david-waltermire david-waltermire merged commit 91084cd into main May 4, 2021
@david-waltermire david-waltermire deleted the 853-version-and-branching-strategy branch May 4, 2021 15:28
Rene2mt added a commit to Rene2mt/OSCAL that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
initial commit of a versioning and branching strategy (usnistgov#895)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant