Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(transition): consider async placeholder as valid child to return, fix #6256 #6369

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 29, 2017

Conversation

jkzing
Copy link
Member

@jkzing jkzing commented Aug 15, 2017

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:
#6256

Hanks10100 and others added 2 commits July 24, 2017 07:32
* build(release weex): ignore the file path of entries

* [release] weex-vue-framework@2.4.2-weex.1
@@ -862,5 +862,89 @@ describe('Component keep-alive', () => {
)
}).then(done)
})

it('async components with transition-mode out-in', done => {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not familiar with writing tests for async components. Feel free to point me out If I'm not in the right way testing it.😅

@yyx990803 yyx990803 merged commit a43d667 into vuejs:dev Aug 29, 2017
@jkzing
Copy link
Member Author

jkzing commented Aug 30, 2017

Thanks👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants