Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

definition of security is too weak #376

Closed
dbaron opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

definition of security is too weak #376

dbaron opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Jul 12, 2019

The definition of security (currently "The system should preserve its integrity and functionality even when subject to attack.") appears (although it's a bit unclear) not to include revealing private information as a failure of security. Maintaining confidentiality of data that was intended to be kept confidential is generally considered part of security. I suspect there are likely also other topics that were omitted but should be included.

It may be preferable to link to an external definition.

(This was originally part of w3ctag/design-reviews#355 (comment) .)

@mlagally mlagally added the WIP label Jul 15, 2019
@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

@dbaron Please take a look at the discussion in #368

When the revised PR is available, there will be a clear definition of security.

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

Call on 22.8.: The PR #368 needs to be updated to contain a definition.

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

Arch call on Aug 29th:

We decided to ask the PING experts for a recommendation:
w3cping/tracking-issues#12

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor

mmccool commented Sep 6, 2019

See PR #384.

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

mlagally commented Sep 12, 2019

resolved by replacing it with ISO definitions in call on Sept 12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants