From 9c8ccbc190ae403353a0ce0593bf2c56c34c2300 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Young <byoung2@wiley.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:01:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Change editoral note about context to ref #104

The matter of where the lifecycle (and by extension WebIDL) exists
is an issue for the working group to discuss and determine, and not
merely an editorial note (as it was previously).

This removes the note and references issue #104 in its place.
---
 index.html | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index e81ebad..e3d2273 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -986,6 +986,8 @@ <h2>Web Publication Lifecycle</h2>
 					these approaches is welcome at any time.</p>
 			</div>
 
+			<p class="issue" data-number="104"></p>
+
 			<section id="obtaining-manifest">
 				<h3>Obtaining a manifest</h3>
 
@@ -1032,9 +1034,6 @@ <h3>Obtaining a manifest</h3>
 
 				<p class="note">See the <a href="#obtaining-manifest-diagram">diagram in the appendix</a> for a visual
 					representation of the algorithm.</p>
-
-				<div class="ednote">The <code>publication</code> value for context doesn't exist yet. The working group
-					will need to define and register this context value.</div>
 			</section>
 
 			<section id="processing-manifest">