diff --git a/content-security-policy/frame-ancestors/frame-ancestors-path-ignored.window.js b/content-security-policy/frame-ancestors/frame-ancestors-path-ignored.window.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..a7897305ae5b43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content-security-policy/frame-ancestors/frame-ancestors-path-ignored.window.js
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// META: script=support/frame-ancestors-test.sub.js
+test = async_test("A 'frame-ancestors' CSP directive with a URL that includes a path should be ignored.");
+testUrlWithPathIgnored();
+
diff --git a/content-security-policy/frame-ancestors/support/frame-ancestors-test.sub.js b/content-security-policy/frame-ancestors/support/frame-ancestors-test.sub.js
index 6e816e89b3837b..ffa807b9346789 100644
--- a/content-security-policy/frame-ancestors/support/frame-ancestors-test.sub.js
+++ b/content-security-policy/frame-ancestors/support/frame-ancestors-test.sub.js
@@ -145,3 +145,16 @@ function testNestedSandboxedIFrame(policy, parent, child, expectation) {
         injectNestedIframe(policy, parent == SAME_ORIGIN ? "same" : "cross", child == SAME_ORIGIN ? "same" : "cross", expectation == EXPECT_LOAD ? "allowed" : "blocked", true /* isSandboxed */);
     };
 }
+
+function testUrlWithPathIgnored() {
+    window.onload = function () {
+        // A policy with a URL with a path should block the load, because no
+        // origin matches against a source expression with a path. See
+        // https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40779556#comment12 and
+        // https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/#frame-ancestors-navigation-response
+        // steps 6.2 and 6.3.
+        injectIFrame(SAMEORIGIN_ORIGIN + "/test", SAME_ORIGIN, EXPECT_BLOCK);
+        // The same policy with no path should allow the load (smoke test).
+        injectIFrame(SAMEORIGIN_ORIGIN, SAME_ORIGIN, EXPECT_LOAD);
+    };
+}